Have you already written your law essay and want a specialist to review it before submission? We proofread and edit the draft you have written, check every OSCOLA footnote and citation, and give written feedback on structure and argument. We do not write essays for students.
The court's reasoning in Donoghue v Stevenson established the modern duty of care.12
12 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562, 580.
13 ibid 599.
Law essay proofreading is a review of a student's own completed draft, correcting grammar, punctuation, clarity and citation formatting without adding or changing legal content.
Our law essay proofreading and editing starts at £12 per page of 250 words. Editing with a full OSCOLA check is £18 to £22 per page.
Standard turnaround is 3 to 5 days. Urgent review is available in 24 to 72 hours, and same day for drafts up to around 2,000 words.
Most UK universities permit proofreading and editing of your own work, and many run their own writing support services. Always check your institution's policy first.
Most law students who come to us understand the material perfectly well. What costs them marks is presentation: citation errors, structural drift and analysis that never quite arrives.
A missing pinpoint, an italicised case name in a footnote, a shortform used before the full citation. Each one is minor. Across sixty footnotes they add up to a grade boundary.
The most common comment on UK law essays. The draft explains what the law is, at length, but never evaluates it or takes a position.
Problem questions need application to the facts. Many drafts recite the relevant authorities and then stop short of advising the party.
The argument starts clearly, then paragraphs begin overlapping, and the conclusion introduces a point that appears nowhere above it.
The criteria state exactly where the marks sit. Most students write the essay first and read the criteria afterwards, if at all.
Tutor comments arrive with the grade. Useful for the next assignment, useless for the one that has already been marked.
Six ways we work on a draft you have already written. Every service improves the essay you submit without adding legal content, arguments or analysis of our own.
Grammar, spelling, punctuation, tense consistency and typographical errors corrected across the full document, with every change tracked so you can see and accept each one.
Sentence clarity, paragraph flow and academic tone improved so the points you have already made read precisely, which matters more in legal writing than in most disciplines.
Every footnote, case citation, statute reference, pinpoint and shortform checked against OSCOLA, including consistency across the whole document. Covered in detail below.
Written commentary on whether your essay answers the question, where the argument loses direction and which sections need development. You decide what to change.
A similarity report on your own draft so you can identify unintentional close paraphrasing or a missing citation before your university's system sees it.
A session on how to structure a problem question, what critical analysis looks like in practice, or how OSCOLA works, so the next essay needs less help than this one.
OSCOLA is footnote based and unusually unforgiving. These are the eight checks we run on every law essay, and the errors we find in almost every draft.
Footnote markers after punctuation, full stops closing each note, and correct order where several sources support one point.
Case name italicised in the text but not the footnote, correct year brackets, court and report series.
Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562
Post 2001 judgments need the neutral citation first, followed by the best report.
R (Miller) v PM [2019] UKSC 41, [2020] AC 373
Short title and year without a comma, correct section, subsection and paragraph format.
Human Rights Act 1998, s 3(1)
The specific page or paragraph you relied on. The single most common omission we correct, and the easiest mark to lose.
Whether ibid, above n and shortened case names are used correctly, and never before the full citation appears.
Journal articles, books, edited collections, command papers and online sources, each with its own OSCOLA pattern.
The same source cited the same way throughout, and every cross reference pointing at the right footnote after edits.
A note on bibliographies. OSCOLA does not require a bibliography for a standard essay, since the footnotes carry the citations. Where one is required, usually for a dissertation or thesis, the format differs from footnotes: authors are listed surname first and entries are grouped by source type. If your module handbook asks for a bibliography, send it with your draft and we will check it against what your department actually requires.
UK law assessments come in two shapes and they need different structures. Using the wrong one is a common reason a well researched draft scores lower than expected.
CLEO follows the same logic with Claim, Law, Evaluation and Outcome, and suits questions where competing arguments need weighing.
If you cannot state your argument in one sentence, the essay does not have one yet. That is usually the first thing our feedback identifies.
Law schools apply academic integrity rules strictly, and a misconduct finding can follow a law student into professional practice. Here is exactly where our service starts and stops.
The distinction matters. We tell you that section three needs restructuring and why. You do the restructuring. That keeps the work yours, which is what your university requires and what a proofreading policy permits.
Share your essay with the question, marking criteria and your department's referencing guide. The criteria matter as much as the essay.
A reviewer with legal academic experience reads your work against the question and the level you are studying at.
You receive a tracked changes document plus written comments explaining what needs work and why, so the reasoning is visible.
You make the final decisions and the final edits. Ask us about anything unclear, then submit work that is genuinely your own.
Expectations rise sharply between levels, particularly around critical analysis, so feedback is always calibrated to what you are being marked against.
Years one to three, including tort, contract, criminal, constitutional, land, equity and EU law coursework.
Intensive timelines and unfamiliar conventions. Referencing and structure are usually where converts lose marks first.
Higher expectations on original argument, academic commentary and engagement with competing scholarship.
Chapter by chapter review, consistency across a long document, and bibliography checking where your department requires one.
Case notes, legal reports, reflective portfolios and problem question answers across all modules.
English language clarity alongside UK academic conventions, which are often quite different from those taught at home.
One page is 250 words. Send your draft for a fixed quote before you commit to anything.
Prices may vary depending on deadline, word count and complexity. Dissertations are quoted per chapter. Send your draft and the question for a fixed quote before any work begins.
The draft is finished but the footnotes have not been checked and there is no time left to read it properly yourself. Express review exists for exactly that.
Send the draft with your question and deadline and we will confirm within the hour whether we can meet it. If we cannot do the work properly in the time available, we will tell you rather than take the fee and rush it.
Check Urgent AvailabilityYour draft is never shared, resold or published. Files are kept only as long as the work requires and then deleted.
The service is built to sit inside UK university rules on proofreading and editing, not to work around them.
Send your marking criteria and referencing guide. Departments vary in how they apply OSCOLA and we follow yours.
We agree a delivery time before starting and meet it. If a deadline is not realistic, we say so upfront.
We do not write law essays for students, and we do not provide work to be submitted as a student's own. We provide proofreading, editing, OSCOLA checking and academic feedback on work you have written yourself. We do not guarantee grades or classifications. What we aim to do is help your writing meet the academic standards and referencing conventions your work will be assessed against.
Proofreading, editing and academic feedback on your own work are legal, and most UK universities run their own writing support services offering the same thing. What is a criminal offence in England, under the Skills and Post-16 Education Act 2022, is providing, arranging or advertising a service that produces the work a student then submits. We do not offer that. Everything we do works on an essay you have already written yourself.
No. We do not write essays, chapters, paragraphs or problem question answers. We only work on drafts students have already written. If you have not written anything yet, we cannot help with that assignment, although we can talk you through how to approach the question and plan your structure.
We cannot promise a grade, and you should be wary of any service that does. Marks depend on your legal understanding, your argument and how your marker applies the criteria. What proofreading and OSCOLA checking reliably do is remove avoidable losses: citation errors, unclear sentences and structural problems. Those marks are recoverable, and that is the part we work on.
Yes, and we encourage it. Most UK universities permit proofreading but set limits on what a third party may change, and some require students to declare that a proofreader was used. Check your academic integrity policy or ask your personal tutor. If your department has specific restrictions, tell us and we will work within them.
Yes, and it is the part of this service law students value most. We check footnote formatting, case citations including neutral citations, statute references, pinpoints, shortforms and ibid usage, secondary sources and consistency across the whole document. Where your department requires a bibliography, we check that too, against your handbook rather than a generic template.
Yes. Problem questions need application to the facts rather than a general account of the law, which is where most drafts fall short. Our feedback identifies where your answer states the rule but never applies it, and where the advice to the party is missing or hedged. You then write the application yourself.
It means taking a position and defending it, rather than describing the law accurately. In practice: evaluating whether a decision was correct, weighing competing academic views, identifying where doctrine is incoherent, and saying what should follow. Description explains what the law is. Analysis argues about whether it should be. Our feedback tells you which of the two your draft is currently doing.
Yes. Same day turnaround is available for drafts up to around 2,000 words, subject to reviewer availability, with 24 to 72 hour options for longer work. Send your draft and deadline and we will confirm within the hour whether we can meet it.
Yes, all three, plus dissertations and coursework such as case notes and legal reports. Expectations differ significantly between levels, particularly around originality of argument at postgraduate level, so feedback is calibrated to what you are being marked against.
Yes. Your draft is never shared with third parties, resold or published anywhere. Files are retained only for as long as the work requires and then deleted. Nothing you send is reused as a sample or template for another student.
Our proofreading starts at £12 per page of 250 words. Editing with a full OSCOLA check is £18 to £22 per page, and full feedback with a structure report is £25 to £30. Urgent turnaround is £30 to £40. Send your draft and the question for a fixed quote before anything begins.
We are based in Karachi and work with law students in the UK and internationally. All reviewers working on UK law essays are familiar with OSCOLA, UK academic conventions and the marking standards British law schools apply.
Share your essay and the question and we will come back with a fixed quote and a realistic delivery time. No obligation, and no pressure to proceed.
Send Your DraftBased in Karachi, supporting law students across the UK and internationally
Contact DIGICS Pvt Ltd today for bespoke, impactful logo solutions.
Gulshan-e-Iqbal, Karachi, Pakistan
+92 (332) 229-2181
Start your brand journey: contact DIGICS for impactful services.